Did you know?

For just playing, both will work about the same. Many think that lichess has a more "smooth" experience when playing on the computer, while chess.com offer a better mobile app. But if you are interested in studying, then chess.com can offer thousands of lessons, videos, articles which are extremely helpful, but to view all of those you may need ...Lichess is about 370-400 points higher than chess.com. To me, its due to their rating formula using a higher initial rating than chess.com. They have a superiority complex where they think people will face more similar skill if they raise all the ratings up with their glicko-2 rating system (chess.com apparently uses a glicko-1 rating system), …Playing chess online can be a lot of fun. Whether you want to learn how to play for the first time or are an advanced player looking for others to connect with online, there are many options available. From website-based game play to phone ...Lichess is a higher quality product with less add bloat, less technical debt, and a unified vision. Lichess chooses chess over money; chesscom chooses money over chess. From my experience, a loaded UI can really harm performance in a bad way.Chess.com vs Lichess Ratings. It seems to me there is a discrepancy of at least 200 points in the corresponding ratings, perhaps even more. Or there are some various psychological and other reasons for me playing much better blitz at lichess than at chess.com. At chess.com any 1600 rated opponent is tough as a nut, will fight you tooth and nail ...Chess is hard to compute, but also not too impossible. If engines like stockfish can calculate incredibly far ahead, it's reasonable to assume that other engines can too. For the sake of discussion, let's just say the scale of computation isn't an issue because there are engines that deal with it effectively.This can help you "translate" the different ratings. As you can see, 1250 Chesscom Blitz is roughly equal to 1460 Lichess Blitz, for example. On lichess you start at a higher elo so the entire player base has a higher average rating. different chess sites, different players, different way to measure the ratings and so on.Really sucks losing 20 points on a tactic after solving 5 for 4 points each but i like that they're untimed. Lichess tactics are quite simple I have found. I’ve been playing chess for 2 months and I’m 2075 rating. I would think my chess rating was 1000-1200.Lichess is less "inflated" compared to chess.com when with more rating you get. Daniel Naroditsky's chess.com blitz rating is 100 points higher than his lichess blitz one. You can't compare different ratings. Well i guess you can but not as easily because the relation isn't linear. At different points on the rating curve you get different resultsWhat I like to do after playing a game on lichess is do the request a computer analysis, you can turn the threat indicator on too and for each move it'll show what the best move is. You can also play through your mistakes.99. 60. r/chess. Join. • 21 days ago. Hikaru on his rivalry vs Magnus: "It wasn't a rivalry until the pandemic. He won every match against me, had a great score against me. Ever since the pandemic I've done better overall. He's one of the two best players of all time, and the fact that I'm able to compete with him makes me very happy."Chesstempo standard: 1500-1600 (5600+ tactics done) Lichess Puzzles: 2000-2100 (Lichess puzzles feel way easier to me, I could probably push my puzzle rating even higher if I properly tried) Lichess Blitz: 1200 : ( (I play a lot of tactics and very little actual chess lol) BrinyEmperor • 1850 rapid chess.com • 2 yr. ago.Jan 1, 2023 · Chess.com Rating vs. FIDE and USCF. The Chess.com ratings map pretty closely to USCF and FIDE ratings overall. You can use it generally as a quick mapping to your USCF rating. USCF ratings start at 100, and the Chess.com equivalent is slightly under 500. Between 100 and 1750, the 400-point gap shrinks as the rating-level increases. It looks so on chess.com. So if my tactic is rated the same as someone with 1500 Fide rating, then maybe I can say I'm tactically as good as 1500 Fide rated players. I can't say the same with my blitz or maybe even classical match rating online. This is because classical OTB is at least 90+30 while on Lichess it is as short as 15+15.Lichess is superior due to the far greater amount of functions compared to chess.com's free version. Everything is free on lichess and I like the interface better. The only thing I will say is that I like that chess.com supports Swiss tournaments, which lichess does not (arena tournaments stress me out, and I don't like streaks or Berserk).ASilverRook 2000 Lichess and Chess.com • 2 yr. ago. The answer is yes, a 1500 should easily win against a GM with queen odds. The GM will try to complicate the game, and maybe in blitz or bullet the GM will be able to make enough tricks, but in rapid or classical, the 1500 should win almost 100% of the time.The only difference is based on rating formulas, so that average is somewhere else. Usually on lichess 1200, on chess.com 1000 or so. Use the logic: if rating pools mattered, then you could launch the same EXACT formula in another website with similar amounts of players and get completely different average numbers, like 1800 vs 1100.Well, one thing i learned from lichess training: itThat's pleasantly surprising :D. mister_XYZ42 Chess.com Rating vs. FIDE and USCF. The Chess.com ratings map pretty closely to USCF and FIDE ratings overall. You can use it generally as a quick mapping to your USCF rating. USCF ratings start at 100, and the Chess.com equivalent is slightly under 500. Between 100 and 1750, the 400-point gap shrinks as the rating-level increases. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest Lichess is about 370-400 points higher than chess.com. To me, its due to their rating formula using a higher initial rating than chess.com. They have a superiority complex where they think people will face more similar skill if they raise all the ratings up with their glicko-2 rating system (chess.com apparently uses a glicko-1 rating system), … What site is your 1400-1500 rating? If it's lichess

Sorry in advance for this ramble. Several reasons come to mind: a) Lichess is 100% free (can make optional donations, but receive no additional features other than a cosmetic badge for your profile). b) Lichess is open source, which is reason enough for many people to support the project. c) The UX feels smoother.On chess.com you start at 1200 I believe while on lichess you start at 1500 so the elo on lichess on the lower levels is higher in comparison. On both sites you are a bit below starting elo so it's basically the same players you play. Lichess ratings run …Chess.com's 'standard' ratings are an OK approximation for USCF ratings, which are a little inflated compared to FIDE. Based on this and comparison of Chess.com vs Lichess ratings, I'd say that your real life Elo would be between 1700 and 1800. hicetnunc1972. I'd say around 1800 OTB in raw strength, but the time-controls are different so it ...For a week, managed to get 700 ratings rapid. So I thought that it was normal for newbies. And then hear about lichess because it's free nature. But after a few games, I got a big jump to 1700 in rapid. So that raises the question of this difference. My initial thought maybe 1700 in chess is the same as 700 in chess.com.Lichess's interface felt slicker when playing fast chess. In fact, on Lichess some players would play bullet at 15 seconds and 30 seconds time controls. Pretty wild. And on Lichess newer players like Penguin made their name. Carlsen played some tournaments on Lichess for fun and when he won he would donate the reward to the next tournament.

Lichess or Chess.com, which is better for a new player? : r/chess r/chess • 3 yr. ago by _-Comic-_ View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit Lichess or Chess.com, which is better for a new player? Could someone tell me the advantages and disadvantages of each one? This thread is archivedLiChess vs Chess.com I’m a long time LiChess player and have a blitz rating of about 1600. I’ve recently started playing on chess.com too but I can’t seem to get above 1000-1050. …

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. The Chess Beginners Wiki is the perfect place to. Possible cause: Love this. I have done a similar method but using Chessable courses (with pro.